The Parity Problem in the Presence of Noise, Decoding Random Linear Codes, and the Subset Sum Problem
APPROX/RANDOM 2005
PublishedSource checked
- Time bound
- 2O(n/log₂ log₂ n)
- Space bound
- Not separately normalized
- Source / version date
- 2005
- Comparison variant
- Classical · fixed noise · polynomial samples
- Cost scale
- 2O(n / log₂ log₂ n)
- Input samples
- n^{1+δ}, fixed δ>0
- Model / assumptions
- Sample amplification analyzed with the leftover hash lemma
- Exact coefficient / bound
- Big-O exponent retained
Assumptions and source notes
Any fixed sample exponent δ>0; constant noise is a specialization of the stated bias range.
Source location
Abstract; §2, Theorem 1
Version: RANDOM 2005 extended abstract, 12 pages
Selected earlier references
Selected sources cited by this paper.
- Noise-Tolerant Learning, the Parity Problem, and the Statistical Query Model
Avrim Blum · Adam Kalai · Hal Wasserman · 2000
Answers the earlier question about subexponential LPN with polynomially many examples. Introduction and reference [2]
BibTeXDownload .bib
@inproceedings{lyubashevsky2005-parity-noise,
author = {Vadim Lyubashevsky},
title = {{The Parity Problem in the Presence of Noise, Decoding Random Linear Codes, and the Subset Sum Problem}},
booktitle = {Approximation, Randomization and Combinatorial Optimization. Algorithms and Techniques},
year = {2005},
volume = {3624},
pages = {378--389},
publisher = {Springer},
doi = {10.1007/11538462_32},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/11538462_32},
keywords = {LPN, sample amplification, polynomial samples},
cr_date = {2005-12-31},
cr_date_precision = {year},
cr_status = {published},
cr_venue = {APPROX/RANDOM 2005, LNCS 3624},
cr_author_ids = {vadim-lyubashevsky},
series = {Lecture Notes in Computer Science}
}