CryptoRecords.info
LWE

Learning With Errors

Recover or distinguish a noisy linear system.

Primal embedding · Gaussian error

Search-LWE through BDD-to-uSVP embedding with a specified empirical gap-to-reduction model

1 results · 1 papers
ClassicalHeuristic / model-dependentUniform random LWE samples; explicit parameter contractParameter-dependent time and space expressions
#PUBLICATION / AUTHORSDATETIME BOUNDSPACE BOUNDEVIDENCE
—On the concrete hardness of Learning with ErrorsMartin R. Albrecht · Rachel Player · Sam ScottJournal of Mathematical Cryptology 2015SourceBibTeX / detailsprimal embedding uSVP historical cost model2 Oct 2015TBKZ(m+1,δ₀); log₂δ₀=[log₂(ε′τ α√(2e))]²/(4nlog₂q)Depends on the SVP oracle and embedding implementation.PublishedSource checked
Comparison definition & assumptions
Regime
Search-LWE through BDD-to-uSVP embedding with a specified empirical gap-to-reduction model
Computation
Classical
Rigor
Heuristic / model-dependent
Instances
Uniform random LWE samples; explicit parameter contract
Cost scale
Parameter-dependent time and space expressions
Parameter
n, q, error width, secret distribution, sample budget and attack parameters
Description
Historical LWE bounds and cost models with parameters retained. Entries without a common fixed asymptotic scale are listed without a numerical rank.
Comparison rules
Specify q(n), error distribution and width convention, secret distribution, available samples, search versus decision objective, success criterion and lattice/algebraic assumptions. Formula-only entries have null coefficients. A concrete instance estimate is not an exponent c in 2^{cn}.
Tags
primal, uSVP, embedding, Gaussian error